The sample on the left right is supposed to be the same as the one on the left. As you can see it is a nice orange colour and no longer transparent despite having not being opened. a colleague pointed this out to the company and while they were happy to refund us they wanted photographic evidence. I'm not sure how rife "media fraud" is within academia but found it quaint how they wanted a photo. So this is what they got. Maybe we should have had a current paper in the background too?